There are
times when you can get the feeling that our communities have been regenerated
to death. Don’t get me wrong, regeneration; if it is done right can bring real
and potentially long lasting benefits to many of our hard-pressed communities.
It is important that regeneration is a process rather than an event and that is
done for people rather than to people and does not end up simply enriching the
regeneration professionals instead of our communities. The unwritten rule
should be if you are going to spend public money then you need to work the
money exceptionally hard to ensure that every possible benefit is extracted.
There is a real need to ensure that any bodies set up to spend public money are
democratically accountable and are established after a wide ranging accessible
consultation process. To most people this should all sound pretty reasonable
and sensible stuff, but it has often been to easily overlooked. The danger is
that many of our local authorities simply perceive ‘regeneration’ as a means to
accessing additional public monies rather than bringing meaningful beneficial
change too many of our communities. Hand in hand with this concerning trend, in
recent years there has been a disturbing tendency to effectively seriously marginalise
any real community real involvement in the regeneration process, something that
undermines the very objective of community based regeneration.
Plaid Cymru, the Party Of Wales, news, comment, opinion and observations from Newport and the South East corner of the old historic county of Gwent...
Monday, December 18, 2017
Saturday, December 2, 2017
NOT GIVING A SCOOBY!
![]() |
| An all to familiar sight - a bank closure notice |
The closures appear
relentless and unstoppable, despite the fact that high street banks could and
should have a roll to play within the economic life of our communities. We
have been here before and will no doubt be back. It should be obvious by
now that the big 4 banks clearly don’t give a Scooby about public opinion or
the consequences of the closures.
The local political
and community leaders have rightly kick off and justifiably angry local
residents have been interviewed by local media. There will be the usual weasel
words from the bank themselves, but, once the initial fuss settles the closure
will roll on – as the large London based banks are pretty much answerable to no
one save themselves – certainly not anyone here in Cymru / Wales.
Dropping
the spin (about the growth in on-line banking and it’s use – if you have no
choice what else are people going to do) this is about nothing more than
cutting running costs, the banks have little (or no concern) for their
relatively unprofitable personal customers or the concerns of their local
business customers or our smaller communities.
As
has been noted elsewhere, by no less than the US Senate, some banks have other
more pressing interests than those of their domestic customers like helping to
launder money for drug dealers, dictators and terrorists, so much for being a
local bank.
Local
banks remain useful for the high street and local communities, they help to
promote vitality and vibrancy and make it easier for local businesses to
operate. Local businesses to a degree benefit from the existence of local high
street branches by picking up passing trade from bank customers.
Once
local bank branches close, the impact will be felt locally especially by older
residents and local business owners who have to trek further and further to pay
in their taking and the subsequent drop in passing trade. This situation has
been aggravated by the demise of many building societies., most by no means all
of which were largely hoovered by the banks.
It
is perhaps a pity that we don’t have some sort of risk free Post Office Savings
bank – save for the fact that it was recklessly sold of by a previous
Conservative government on the cheap. That said, it is of course important to
remember that one result of the demise of the regional banks was the relentless
rise of the big 4 banks which led to the growth of the reckless casino banking
and cheap credit that brought about the financial crash.
Once
you factor in the ruthless Post Office closure programme that was pushed
through by the then Labour Government, the former Con - Dem coalition
government prior to it’s privatisation of the Post Office. Which in turn was
preceded by the rapid floatation and rapid demise of most of our building
societies you can clearly see how we got here - sorting the mess out is not
going to be easy – perhaps as has been said before we need some sort of
publically owned community owned Wales savings bank.
Saturday, November 25, 2017
WAKE UP AND SMELL THE COFFEE
![]() |
| Why are we are still waiting... |
Westminster’s failure to commit to the Swansea Bay Tidal lagoon and
the broken promise over electrification of the min line to Swansea from
Cardiff, while being disappointing are simply very visible symptoms of the
Westminster Parliament and most Westminster parliamentarians (with some honorable
exceptions) lack of concern for Wales and our national interests. Westminster
is simply not interested in making Wales thrive, or allowing Wales to become a world-beater
in the development of renewable energy technologies and to generate the
technologies and jobs that go with it.
As I have said previously I have long believed that Westminster
government’s regardless of their political hue, before and after devolution,
and before and after BREXIT, remain fundamentally indifferent to our needs, our
aspirations and our national interests.
The cancelation of the electrification of the Great Western line, from
Cardiff to Swansea should have come as no real surprise. I had long advocated
beginning the electrification process at the Swansea end of the line, something
that may well have made the cancellation more difficult.
The foot-dragging over the fate of the Swansea Tidal lagoon remains ominous,
but sadly it is to be expected from a Westminster system that remains hooked on
expensive subsidies to foreign owned and foreign constructed Nuclear power
stations. One reason for this is that it is perhaps easier for former energy
minsters to get better paid jobs post their involvement in politics, with
subsidy rich energy companies.
Interest in developing Tidal lagoons is not new; the concept has
been floated around in Wales since the late 1990’s. The problem that successive
private companies when faced with sluggish perhaps finely calculated
indifference from both government (at all levels) and the civil service have
moved on or lost interest.
Post BREXIT we need the Tidal lagoons more than ever, if Westminster
is serious about reducing the UK’s dependence on imported energy supplies from
unstable regions, run by brutal repressive regimes – then developing Tidal
lagoons could be a step towards real energy independence. Rather than
marshaling their lame tired old excuses as to why they cannot or won’t buy in
to the project, we need a commitment to secure power generation.
The devolution of powers relating to energy resource development to
Wales and a Welsh government that is not sleeping walking on the job is
necessity. Post BREXIT we need to step away from our low wage culture and to
develop a much more economically dynamic and sustainable Welsh economy. We are not going to get anything done with a
Labour in Wales government in Cardiff Bay that’s too busy looking after its own
personal and party political interests rather than our national interests.
Wednesday, November 15, 2017
GIVE WALES A SAY!
Shadow Cabinet Secretary for External Affairs @steffanlewis has written to @fmwales requesting an explanation why Labour MPs refuse to #GiveWalesASay on #Brexit pic.twitter.com/l4cLagletp— Plaid Cymru (@Plaid_Cymru) November 15, 2017
CONSEQUENCES...
Whether people voted remain or leave
last year there are going to be real and significant post brexit consequences for Wales. After yesterday's vote the Westminster Conservative / DUP Coalition Government, ably
supported by Jeremy Corbyn's Labour MP’s (who abstained), will pretty much be
able to force through the Withdrawal Bill even if Scotland, Wales and Northern
Ireland all vote against it, after a Plaid Cymru amendment was defeated in the
House of Commons.
Plaid Cymru were supported by the
Scottish National Party, the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party but were
opposed by the Tories and the DUP, with Labour failing to vote at all. The amendment would have required the
Prime Minister to secure the agreement of each of the devolved countries in the
UK before repealing the European Communities Act 1972.
Plaid Cymru has written to the First
Minister of Wales, and leader of the Labour Group in the National Assembly,
asking for an explanation as to why the Labour Party changed position on giving
Wales a meaningful say in the Assembly on the final Brexit deal.
In the letter, Plaid Cymru’s External
Affairs spokesperson, Steffan Lewis AM, has accused Labour MPs of
undermining the National Assembly’s ability to act in the interests of Wales
and of providing the British Government will a mandate to “ride roughshod over the democratically-expressed wishes of the people”.
After
the vote, Plaid Cymru’s Brexit spokesperson in Westminster, Hywel
Williams MP, said:
“Tonight, the people of Wales were told that their opinion does not
matter on Brexit.
“The Westminster parties have once again teamed up to make sure Wales’s
voice counts for nothing when it comes to our own economy, our people’s wages
and our children’s standard of living.
“The UK consists of four countries, not just one, but tonight MPs from
the Westminster parties ensured that Brexit will be dictated by just one of
those countries.
“Our amendment was not an attempt to derail Brexit – it was an attempt
to make sure Wales and the other UK countries have an equal say on our future.
Every national Parliament should be involved in this process, not just
Westminster.
“Plaid Cymru MPs will continue to do all we can to make sure Wales’s
interests are protected and voiced in Westminster, despite Labour’s apathy.”
Plaid Cymru’s Shadow Cabinet Secretary for
External Affairs and Brexit spokesperson in the Assembly, Steffan Lewis AM,
added:
“That our own government in Wales, run by the Labour Party, chose to
deny the people of Wales an opportunity to have a say on Brexit, is the single
greatest act of harm inflicted upon the Welsh national interest since Article
50 was triggered.
“The Labour Party has repeatedly told Welsh citizens that they believe
Wales should have a meaningful say on the terms of Brexit but tonight they went
against their word and instead have ensured Wales’s future lies in the hands of
the Tories and the DUP in Westminster.
“There is no doubt that the ability of our National Assembly to act in
the interests of Wales have been greatly undermined by the actions of Labour
MPs tonight. Labour has failed the people of Wales and has provided a mandate
for the Tories in London to ride roughshod over the democratically-expressed
wishes of the people of Wales in two referenda.
“Once again it falls to Plaid Cymru to fight for our citizens’ interests
– the future of our NHS, Welsh jobs and wages and standard of living. Plaid
Cymru will be doing all we can at both the Westminster Parliament and our own
Parliament in Wales to make sure Wales’ interests are heard and protected. We
will start by calling the First Minister to the Assembly tomorrow with a
topical question, asking for an explanation of his party’s abstention.”
Tuesday, November 7, 2017
REMEMBERANCE
![]() |
| In Flanders Fields... |
This Saturday will be the 11th November
(with Remembrance Sunday on the 12th) when people pause briefly to
publically remember the veterans and survivors of historic and more recent
conflicts and those who never came back. My family like far too many others in
Wales (and elsewhere) had relatives who served and survived and also relatives
who lost their lives in the First and Second World Wars and other conflicts.
One of my maternal grandmother’s lost two brothers in the First World War and its aftermath, her elder brother was a regular soldier, who wrote home and told them not to allow his younger brother to join up and to come out to France. It was too late the younger brother had already joined up was killed in action in 1918 and buried near Amiens. I grew up with a generation of older relative who had seen service in the second world war in the armed forces and the merchant navy - not that they ever talked about it save to those whom they had severed with.
As I have said previously I have absolutely no problem remembering those who lost their lives and the courage, comradeship and their endurance of those who served in the First World War and other conflicts (and not necessarily in the armed forces); but I have no time for rose tinted nostalgic flag waving foot-tapping pap. As has been said elsewhere, soldiers don’t die for the politicians, for patriotism or even us but for their friends and comrades with whom they serve.
Far too many lie in corners of foreign fields, are names on a war memorial, faded photographs, faded memories or literally have no grave at all. US President Abraham Lincoln rightly noted at Gettysburg the fallen have given their last full measure of devotion. It may be more true today that the world will little note the current crop of political leader’s lyrical offerings on conflict, nor long remember them. What we should never forget what the former soldiers and veterans did and what they went through and we should not just cherish their memory but ensure that after their military service they are fully honoured as is the military covenant.
One of my maternal grandmother’s lost two brothers in the First World War and its aftermath, her elder brother was a regular soldier, who wrote home and told them not to allow his younger brother to join up and to come out to France. It was too late the younger brother had already joined up was killed in action in 1918 and buried near Amiens. I grew up with a generation of older relative who had seen service in the second world war in the armed forces and the merchant navy - not that they ever talked about it save to those whom they had severed with.
As I have said previously I have absolutely no problem remembering those who lost their lives and the courage, comradeship and their endurance of those who served in the First World War and other conflicts (and not necessarily in the armed forces); but I have no time for rose tinted nostalgic flag waving foot-tapping pap. As has been said elsewhere, soldiers don’t die for the politicians, for patriotism or even us but for their friends and comrades with whom they serve.
Far too many lie in corners of foreign fields, are names on a war memorial, faded photographs, faded memories or literally have no grave at all. US President Abraham Lincoln rightly noted at Gettysburg the fallen have given their last full measure of devotion. It may be more true today that the world will little note the current crop of political leader’s lyrical offerings on conflict, nor long remember them. What we should never forget what the former soldiers and veterans did and what they went through and we should not just cherish their memory but ensure that after their military service they are fully honoured as is the military covenant.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)


